Apparatus for chemiluminescent assays

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein is a device and methods for the rapid chemiluminescence assay of surfaces to detect the presence of microbial contamination. The device and methods are suitable for use by untrained personnel under the relatively harsh and variable conditions found in the field, for example in fast food restaurants and other food preparation areas. The chemiluminescence reaction that is the source of the analytical signal in the disclosed assay device and method is preferably based on a luciferase/luciferin system. The method for sampling disclosed herein comprises the steps of pre-wetting the sampling swab to a level below that of absorptive saturation; wiping a surface to be sampled with the swab with sufficient pressure to expel the wetting solution onto the surface; and, after reducing the pressure exerted on the sampling swab, further wiping the surface to re-absorb the moisture from the surface.

PRIOR APPLICATION

I claim priority benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/193,519 filed Mar. 31, 2000.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates, in general, to methods and apparatus for therapid and semi-automated assay of materials indicative of the presenceof microbial species such as bacteria.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The ability to rapidly and conveniently detect microorganisms isimportant for several industries, such as food preparation, medicine,beverages, toiletries, and pharmaceuticals. For example, the ability todetect bacterial contamination, particularly on surfaces, is paramountto improving safety in food processing and food service industries.During food processing, food can become contaminated with bacteria andthen spoil. Furthermore, such contamination can be spread throughcontact of food with contaminated surfaces. Food poisoning can result iffood contaminated with pathogenic bacteria, or its toxic products, isingested without proper cooking. Public awareness of this potentialproblem is reflected in articles appearing regularly in the popularpress. See, for example, Brody, J., “A World of Food Choices, and aWorld of Infectious Organisms,” and “Clean Cutting Boards Are NotEnough: New Lessons in Food Safety,” The New York Times, Jan. 30, 2001.In addition, spread of disease in hospitals and other facilities oftenoccurs as a result of the passage of infectious microbes on the surfaceof clothes or equipment.

In light of this potential hazard, it is not enough to simply clean orsanitize a surface and assume it is free from microorganisms such asbacteria. Instead, there is a critical need to perform a test to detectwhether the surface is actually free of microorganisms. Thus, randomareas of a surface, such as a food preparation surface, can be testedfor microorganisms to determine the general cleanliness of the surface.

One of the oldest methods to check for cleanliness involves culturingsamples for bacteria. A test surface is chosen and wiped with a swab,and then the swab is smeared onto a culture medium. The medium isincubated and then checked for the presence of bacterial colonies grownin the medium. This is essentially the same type of procedure that isfollowed in the health services area when testing biological samples,such as a throat swab, for the presence of bacterial species such asstreptococcus. Over the years, various types of culture media have beendeveloped, along with numerous products based thereon. While the resultsof bacterial cultures are accurate, they are limited by the time that ittakes to incubate the culture, usually on the order of days.

Unfortunately, such prior art methods for detecting bacterialcontamination are too cumbersome and time consuming for immediate use byuntrained workers. In particular, much more rapid bacterial assays areneeded, particularly in slaughterhouses and food handlingestablishments. In these locations one must rapidly determine whetheradditional cleaning methods are required or whether proper safetyprocedures have been followed. Bacterial assays would be a usefulcomponent of a “hazards and critical control points program” (HCCP) tomonitor and control bacterial contamination. However, typical bacterialassays based on cell culture techniques cannot provide results within ameaningful time frame.

In response for a need to obtain results more quickly, other methods fordetecting microorganisms have been developed. The most productive areaof development has focused on the detection of biomass on the testsurface. Biomass includes living cells, dead cells, and other bioticproducts such as blood, and food residue. Biomass can be detected by anassay for ATP, adenosine triphosphate, a chemical found in all livingorganisms.

This assay is generally based on the “firefly” biochemical reaction thatproduces the characteristic bioluminescence associated with fireflies.The specific chemistry of this reaction will be discussed in more detailbelow. When appropriate reagents are mixed with a sample taken from atest surface, extracellular ATP immediately reacts and generatesdetectable chemiluminescence. However, intracellular ATP cannot bedetected unless the ATP is first extracted from within the cells.Typically, this is accomplished by mixing the sample with an extractionreagent (releasing reagent) that extracts the ATP from within the cellsor lyses the cells to permit access of ATP to chemiluminescent reagents.Typical extraction reagents are detergents. The extracted ATP then canbe mixed with the luciferase/luciferin reagent to produce the observablereaction. It is important that the extraction reagent chosen does notinactivate the reagents. An additional consideration is the toxicity ofthe lysing agent, particularly when used on food preparation surfaces.

Chemiluminescent assays of ATP have traditionally been conducted usingtwo basic types of systems: vial systems and all-in-one swab devices. Avial system uses a series of vials containing the reagents necessary toconduct the ATP tests. An all-in-one swab device provides all of thereagents and the swab in a self-contained apparatus.

In a vial system, for example, a first vial contains the extractionreagent, a second vial contains dried reagents, and a third vialcontains a buffered solution. At the time of the test, addition of anappropriately buffered solvent from the third vial to the vialcontaining the reagents results in the re-hydration of the reagents.

Wiping a “Q-Tip-®” type swab across the testing surface effectivelysamples whatever organisms may be present. Usually, the swab ispre-wetted with saline or an appropriate buffer solution. The swabcontaining the sample is placed in a test tube. Next, the proper amountof extraction reagent from the first vial is pipetted into the test tubecontaining the swab. After sufficient time has passed to ensure ATPextraction, the buffered solution containing hydrated reagent ispipetted into the test tube and the chemiluminescent reagents areallowed to react with the ATP. The test tube is then placed into aluminometer where the amount of light produced by the reaction ismeasured. If more than one sample is taken, each sample is placed in itsown test tube.

Although vial systems can produce acceptable results, there aredeficiencies. One significant problem is that the reagent solutions mustbe used within a short time of their preparation. If leftover solutionis saved for later tests, the reagents will likely degrade andultimately become ineffective, thus producing no reaction even in thepresence of ATP (a false negative result). This problem is compounded bycommercial producers of typical reagents that sell the reagent only inquantities that produce an amount of solution that is greater than thatneeded for individual tests. Furthermore, the alternative, driedreagents, can be relatively costly. Thus, the vial system results inwaste of expensive reagents when only an individual test is required.Another shortcoming of vial systems is that accurate pipetting andmixing of reagents is required. A pipette is used to transfer thereagents from vial to vial or vial to tube. While pipetting can behighly accurate, it is laborious and time consuming. Also, if any of thevials or pipettes are not sterile, the biomass contained in them willproduce a false positive for the presence of ATP. Furthermore, properpipetting technique requires significant skill and experience, thusmaking consistent and accurate results difficult to attain without arelatively high degree of expertise on the part of the operator.

The all-in-one swab devices apply the same reaction as the vial systemsbut keep all of the reagents and swab in a self-contained apparatus thatfits into a luminometer or, alternatively, can create a test solutionthat can be transferred (and transported) to a standard cell for aluminometer. More specifically, the all-in-one devices typically involvea swab that is placed in a plastic tube containing several chambers. Anadvantage to this system is that a unit dose of each reagent is providedfor one test, thus avoiding waste of reagents when only one test isrequired. However, a certain procedure must be followed using anall-in-one device to ensure that the reagents are combined at theappropriate times and in the appropriate sequence.

In a typical all-in-one device, a swab pre-wetted with a wettingsolution is placed in a sealed tube until ready for use. The wettingsolution may contain an extractant. The sealed tube prevents evaporationof the wetting solution. At the appropriate time, the device is opened,the operator removes a pre-wetted swab, and collects a sample by wipingthe swab along the testing surface. If present, the extractant willresult in the release of intracellular ATP from the sample collected onthe swab. The operator then places the swab back in the tube and thetube, once resealed, is ready for the ATP present in the sample to reactwith the chemiluminescence reagents.

Although numerous technologies have evolved in the implementation ofall-in-one ATP assay systems, devices available to date haveconsistently displayed shortcomings rendering them less than ideal foruse under the conditions most likely to be encountered. Examples in theprior art illustrate how others, with less than complete success, haveapproached the various problems discussed herein. For example, EuropeanPatent Application No. 0 309 429, entitled “Luminometric assay ofcellular ATP,” to Life Sciences International AB, discloses methods andan apparatus directed toward quantitation of biomass in a samplespecimen. The disclosed apparatus comprises a reagent carrier and afibrous sampling element (either separate or combined in a singlestructure), along with cuvettes containing a buffering solution intowhich the sampling element is placed for luminometric analysis. Due tothe stated purpose of the device to obtain results for total bacterialbiomass, the disclosed method comprises treatment of an aliquot of aliquid sample at elevated temperatures for a time sufficient toevaporate essentially all of the solvent medium for the purpose ofdegrading non-bacterial ATP from the sample. Also included in theapparatus and method is a calibration stick containing a known amount ofATP standard in a dried form, However, the disclosed apparatus andmethods still suffer from considerable complexity and limitedapplication, as the actual luminometric measurements giving rise to abiomass determination are contemplated to be performed on alaboratory-scale apparatus. Thus, the complexity of the process and theneed for a full-scale laboratory apparatus imposes a requirement foroperator skill and sophisticated equipment that renders the disclosedinvention unsuitable for rapid, in situ analyses by untrained personnelin less-than-ideal field conditions.

PCT application WO 95/25948, entitled “Sample Collecting and AssayDevice,” to Celsis International PLC, discloses a hand-held samplingdevice comprising a glass tube with one or more reagent wells sealed bya frangible membrane or foil, as well as a sampling swab made from asuitably absorbent material. The disclosed use for the sampling devicecontemplates piercing one of the frangible seals with the sampling swabto moisten the swab, sampling a surface to be analyzed with themoistened swab, returning the swab with sample to the device and furtherpuncturing the remaining one or more frangible seals to expose the swabwith sample to reagent solutions contained therein. The sampling device,wherein the swab has been exposed to reagent solutions, can then beplaced, after a suitable period of incubation, in a luminometer tomeasure the level of chemiluminescence from the sample, although thereference fails to disclose details of the type or construction of theluminometer. Alternatively, the sampling device may comprise a singlereservoir with a frangible seal, wherein the reservoir contains awetting solution only. It is clear that the disclosure is directedsolely toward the sampling device only and contemplates measurement ofchemiluminescence collected with the device of the invention in aconventional, laboratory-scale instrument, specifically adapted to holdthe sampling device or to receive sample-containing solutions from thedevice. Thus, the disclosed invention, due to the relative complexity ofthe multi-compartment sampling device using reagents in solution form,along with the need for a relatively sophisticated measurementinstrument is not ideally suited for use by untrained operators in therelatively harsh conditions of a field environment.

PCT application WO 98/27196, entitled “Sample-Collecting and AssayDevice,” to Celsis International PLC, discloses a hand held samplingdevice with a pen-type configuration. The sampling device comprises afluid reservoir with a frangible seal, which seal may be broken by theinward depression of a top portion of the device, releasing wettingsolution that travels downward through an internal portion of thedevice, wetting a conventional absorbent swab. The swab may then beremoved to sample a surface and returned to the device. Thereafter, abottom cuvette portion is pressed upward breaking a frangible sealbetween the swab-containing central portion of the device and the bottomcuvette portion and releasing fluid from the central portion into thecuvette portion. The cuvette portion may contain further reagents indried form. A window in the cuvette wall permits visual inspection of acolor developed by a reaction between sample and reagents.Alternatively, light may be emitted from the sample byATP-chemiluminescence. However, as with WO 95/25948, the applicationdoes not disclose details of the luminescence measuring device, althoughthe implication is clear that the device would be a laboratory-scaleinstrument, perhaps adapted to receive the disclosed sampling device.

U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,827,675 and 5,965,453, both entitled “Test Apparatus,System and Method for the Detection of Test Samples,” Skiffington andZomer, inventors, and assigned to Charm Sciences, Inc., disclose amulti-component sampling device designed to be used with a desktopanalytical luminometer. The sampling device is comprised of a coverportion into which is removably secured a “Q-Tip®” style swabbing stickwith an absorbent material on one end. In operation, the cover and swabare removed from the central portion of the sampling device and the tipof the swab, presumably after being wetted with an external solution, isrubbed across a surface to be analyzed. The swab is then returned to thesampling device where the portion of the device containing the swab ismoved downwardly within the device, rupturing frangible seals betweensequential reagent-containing reservoirs. Continued downward movementresults in the swab tip being immersed in the reagent solutions releasedfrom the storage reservoirs in a microtube test unit that forms thebottom component of the sampling device. This test unit may also containa reagent tablet that, upon contact with the solutions from the rupturedstorage reservoirs releases reagents necessary to generate theanalytical signal. The microtube test unit is then removed from thesampling device, sealed with an aluminum seal stored on the externalsurface of the device and transported to the desktop analyticalinstrument where either color or a luminescent signal is recorded.Although offering a number of advantages over prior art methods anddevices, the invention disclosed in this reference still suffers fromthe drawbacks of a somewhat complex internal structure to the samplingdevice, and the extensive handling required to remove the microtube fromthe bottom of the device and seal the same before being transported to aseparate desktop analytical device for actual measurement.

In a series of applications (see EP 0 717 840 B1; EP 0 439 525 B; WO95/07457; and WO 90/04775), Biotrace Ltd. has disclosed, generally, atest kit comprising a luminometer and a sampling device fordetermination of bacteria and other living cells for an assessment ofhygienity. The kit comprises a luminometer with a photodetector, whereinthe detector is an avalanche photodiode; a plurality of pipettes andpipette tips, sample vessels, sterile swabs, and containers of reagentsfor fluorescence or luminescence reactions. The cuvettes may alsocontain appropriate enzymes in a dried form for the chemiluminescent orfluorescent reactions. In operation, a sterile swab is removed from itspackaging, wiped across a surface to be analyzed, and returned to apipette tip. The pipette tip is then attached to a pipette, and thepipette is used to draw a predetermined exact volume of appropriatereagent solution, such as a solution containing a lysing agent, into thepipette. The resultant mixture is allowed to incubate for a suitableperiod of time. The reagent within the pipette is then transferred to acuvette, where the solution is withdrawn back into the pipette and thenre-transferred to the cuvette a number of times in order to ensureadequate mixing. The cuvette is then placed in the luminometer whereemission is measured. Although the invention disclosed in theseapplications offers some advantages over other prior art methods anddevices, in that the kit of the invention comprises a portableanalytical device, the invention as a whole still presents somesignificant shortcomings. Principal among these is the relativecomplexity of the process by which a sample swab interacts with thereagents necessary to develop an analytical signal. As one of skill inthe relevant art would recognize, there is a considerable amount ofskill required in the manipulation of pipettes and other such transferglassware in order to insure proper preparation of resulting solutions.Thus, the disclosed invention would likely not be ideally suited for useby untrained operators in the harsh and variable conditions found in thefield.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,504, entitled “Specimen Test Unit,” to Nason,discloses, in general, a sample collection device adapted forapplications involving chemiluminescence assays. The disclosed samplecollection device comprises a cap portion to which is attached anelongated swab, the distal tip of which comprises a “Q-Tip®” styleabsorbent material. The cap portion also contains a storage well inwhich is a frangible glass ampoule within which is stored a suitablereagent, or other, solution. The storage well is separated from thedistal swab portion by a porous filter disk. Alternatively, the filterdisk may be impregnated with additional reagents. In operation, the capportion is removed from the device and the swab tip is used to collectsample from a surface to be analyzed. The cap and swab assembly is thenreturned to the sampling device. The top-most portion of the cap is thensqueezed or otherwise deformed so that the reagent-containing ampoule isbroken to release its contents to flow downwardly through the device tothe swab tip. The filter disk effectively permits the flow of solutionwithout permitting the passage of remnants of the broken ampoule. If thefilter disk is impregnated with additional reagents, then thesepresumably mix with the fluid contents of the ampoule as that fluidflows downwardly through the device. The solution/reagent mix flows overthe swab tip and collects in the bottom portion of the sampling device.At this point, the sampling device may be inserted into an analyticalinstrument for a determination of the luminescence from the sample, butthe reference does not disclose details on the type or construction ofsuch a device. Presumably, such an instrument would be alaboratory-scale device. Alternatively, the sampling device can be usedto transport the sample/reagent to a cuvette or other sample cell foranalysis in a conventional instrument. As with other examples of theprior art, this reference exhibits shortcomings in overall design thatrender it incapable of meeting the ideal criteria for such a devicearticulated herein. For example, the device is somewhat complex indesign and manufacture and requires the use of glass ampoules as reagentreservoirs. Given the likely storage and use of such a sampling devicein the field, such constructions are less than ideal.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,672,039, entitled “Apparatus for Registering thePresence of Bacteria, Particularly in Field Conditions,” Lundbloom,inventor, and assigned to AB Sangtec Medical, discloses a portablefield-test apparatus for the detection of a threshold level of bacteriain samples. The device is designed to receive an injection of a liquidsample suspected of harboring bacterial organisms onto a filter portionof the device. The bacteria so introduced to the device then have aseries of reagent solutions sequentially sprayed upon them, thesolutions comprising sodium hydroxide, luminol and perborate in preciseamounts. An opening in the device is then closed and a transparentwindow portion permits chemiluminescence from the sample to impinge upona light recording means that is preferably a piece of photographic,Polaroid-type, film. Although the disclosed device is presumably capableof use under field conditions, the complex process of the sequentialspraying of specific amounts of different reagents, the need to utilizea liquid sample and the requirement for a light-tight environmentimposed by a photographic film detector all represent significantdepartures from an ideal configuration or method of use.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,353,868, entitled “Specimen Collecting Device,” Joslinand Dennison, inventors, assigned to Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc.,discloses, generally, a sampling device. The disclosed inventioncomprises a multi-part sampling device with a top cap portion to whichis attached a “Q-Tip®” style swabbing stick with an absorbent materialon one end, and a container portion that houses a solution reservoir.The solution reservoir is separated from the upper body of the containerportion by a frangible seal. In use, the upper cap portion is removedand the exposed swab tip is used to swipe a surface suspected ofbacterial contamination. The cap portion is then returned to the devicewherein a downwardly directed force ruptures the membrane covering thesolution reservoir and immerses the swab tip into the solution containedtherein. The sample exposed to the reagent solution within the devicemay then be transported to a laboratory environment where the solutionmay be subsequently transferred to an appropriate sample cell or cuvettefor analysis in a laboratory-scale instrument. However, the relativelyshort time over which emission of measurable luminescence will occurfrom the sample is such that the time between rupture of the reservoirseal to transfer of the resulting solution to an analytical instrumentmust be rather short. It is clear from the disclosure of this referencethat the invention is suited solely for collection and transport ofsamples to an analytical facility with the capability for accuratefluorescence measurements. Thus, although the sampling device may beused in the field, there must necessarily be s substantial passage oftime from collection of a sample in the filed to receipt of actualanalytical results.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,810, entitled “Method for the Detection of SurfacesContaminants,” Miller and Loomis, inventors, and assigned to NewHorizons Diagnostics Corp., discloses a sample collection device for usein a method to detect the presence of bacteria in a sample. Thereference discloses that sample collection can be by means of a “Q-Tip®”style swabbing tip or, alternatively, by means of small absorbentsponges. In practice, the swabbing tip or sponge is wet with a wettingsolution and contacted with a surface suspected of bacterialcontamination. The swabbing device or sponge is then transferred to areservoir of collection fluid wherein the sampling material isintimately mixed with the fluid. In the case of the use of sponges forsample collection, the reservoir of collection fluid is physicallymanipulated to facilitate the mixing of sample with the collectionfluid. For a flexible plastic reservoir as disclosed in the reference,the physical manipulation comprises repeated squeezing or wringing outof the sponge within the reservoir. The disclosed method contemplatesthe use of a large volume concentration apparatus into which isdelivered the extraction fluid from the external reservoir after mixingwith the sampling device. The bacterial cells in the concentrated sampleare then lysed and the resultant mixed with appropriatechemiluminescence reagents. A volume of the ATP-containing fluid is thentransferred to an appropriate instrument for measurement of emissionintensity. It would be apparent to one of skill in the relevant art thatsuch an apparatus and method involves considerably more complexity thanwould be suitable for use under field conditions by an unskilledoperator. Thus, the teachings of the reference fall far short ofattaining the goals of an ideal apparatus or method for hygienemonitoring.

In U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,399, entitled “Chemiluminescent Assay Methods andDevices for Detecting target analytes, Childs et al., inventors, and PCTapplication WO 08/49544, entitled “Hand-Held Luminometer,” McClintock etal., inventors, both assigned to Universal Healthwatch, Inc., there aredisclosed a sampling and luminescence developing device, and a hand-heldluminometer in which to read the luminescence signal so generated. Thereferences disclose a sample collection and signal development devicecomprising an absorbent material, such a filter paper, for collection ofsamples and a second absorbent material for loading with appropriatereagents for the generation of a chemiluminescence signal.Alternatively, the device may combine the sample collection and reagentstorage portions in a single structure of absorbent material. The devicemay also contain a reservoir of carrier liquid. Upon collection of asample by wiping the absorbent material on the surface to be analyzed, acarrier fluid is applied from the reservoir to the absorbent materialand, by wicking action, travels horizontally along the thin strips ofabsorbent material. The movement of the carrier fluid by capillaryaction through the absorbent material results in the migration of sampleand/or reagent to a reaction zone wherein a chemiluminescent reactionmay take place. The emission generated by such reaction is released fromthe device through a form of transparent window and subsequentlyimpinges upon the detector portion of a luminometer. The luminometerdisclosed by the references comprises a handle portion and a headportion, the head portion further comprising one or more electroniccomponents of the device, such as a display. The device also comprises asample section designed to receive the sampling and luminescencedevelopment device described immediately above. Alternatively, thesample section may work with a cuvette inserted into the section, thecuvette containing a fluid sample for analysis. The means included inthe device for detection of a luminescence signal may comprise aphotomultiplier tube, a charge coupled device (CCD), or a photoncounting device. The preferred signal detection means is aphotomultiplier tube (PMT), such as a Mamamatsu H5773. Although thedisclosed devices offer a number of improvements over the prior artsampling and detection devices, the use of the sampling device remainssomewhat complex in the requirement for application of a carrier fluidto the sampling device in order to effect contact of the sample with thenecessary chemiluminescent reagents. One of skill in the art wouldappreciate the variations potentially introduced through the need tohandle and deliver the carrier fluid.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first embodiment, the present invention provides a device for usein a chemiluminescence assay for the detection of contamination, thedevice comprising a sampling wand comprising (i) an internal reagentreservoir disposed toward a distal end of the wand; (ii) an externalsampling swab disposed on a surface at the distal end of the wand; and(iii) a first frangible seal disposed between the sampling swab and thereagent reservoir; and a reaction chamber comprising (i) an upperportion into which the sampling wand may be inserted in a fluid-tight,longitudinally slidable arrangement; (ii) a lower portion; (iii) asecond frangible seal disposed between the upper portion and the lowerportion; and (iv) a reactant disc disposed within the lower portion at adistal end of the chamber, wherein, upon longitudinal movement of thesampling wand within the upper chamber to a first operative position,the first frangible seal is ruptured permitting fluid flow of a reagentsolution stored within the reservoir into the upper portion of thechamber; and wherein, upon further longitudinal movement of the samplingwand to a second operative position, the second frangible seal isruptured, permitting fluid flow of the reagent solution from the upperportion of the chamber into the lower portion of the chamber, whereuponthe reagent solution contacts the reactant disc.

Preferably, the device of the present invention provides a reagentsolution within the reagent reservoir that is a buffer solution. Morepreferably, the buffer solution comprises a neutralizing agent. Morepreferably still, the neutralizing agent is selected from the groupconsisting of non-ionic detergents, cyclodextrins and bovine serumalbumin.

In one aspect, the present invention contemplates a sampling swabcomprised of a polymeric material. Preferably, the sampling swab iscomprised of a reaction product between polyvinyl alcohol and analdehyde to produce a polyvinyl acetal, wherein the polymeric materialhas a density of approximately 0.1 g/cc, an average pore size of 0.2 mm,a pore size range of 0.004-0.4 mm, and an absorptive capacity ofapproximately 10 g water/g of polymeric material. More preferably, thesampling swab is wetted with a solution comprising an extracting agent.More preferably still, the extracting agent is a detergent. Even morepreferably, the detergent is benzalkonium chloride.

In another aspect of the present invention, the reactant disc iscomprised of a polymeric material. Preferably, the polymeric material iscomprised of a reaction product between polyvinyl alcohol and analdehyde, wherein the polymeric material has a density of about 0.05g/cc; an average pore size of 0.95 mm; a pore size range of about 0.2 mmto about 1.2 mm; and an absorptive capacity of approximately 15 g ofwater/g of polymeric material.

In yet another aspect of the invention, the first frangible seal iscomprised of aluminum foil, and the second frangible seal is alsocomprised of aluminum foil.

In a specific embodiment, the reactant disk of the device of the presentinvention is loaded with reagents for a chemiluminescent reaction.Preferably, the reagents comprise a luciferase reactant system. Morepreferably, the reactants are loaded onto the reactant disk bycontacting a solution of the reactants in an appropriate solvent ontothe polymeric material of which the disc is comprised and evaporatingthe solvent from the polymeric material. More preferably still, thesolution of reactants further comprises a buffer. Even more preferablythe buffer is a solution of tricine,N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]glycine.

In another aspect, the device of the present invention provides for atleast a portion of the distal end of the reaction chamber beingtransparent to visible light.

In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a methodfor assaying a surface suspected of contamination by the presence ofcellular material on the surface, the method comprising the steps of (a)contacting the surface with a sampling swab wetted with a solutioncomprising an extracting agent so as to obtain a sample of at least aportion of the cellular material, if any, present on the surface; (b)transferring the sampling swab to a reaction chamber; (c) contacting thesampling swab with a second reagent solution so as to rinse the cellularmaterial from the swab and into the second reagent solution; (d)collecting the second reagent solution within the reaction chamber; (e)contacting the second reagent solution with a reactant mixture; (f)placing the reaction chamber in close proximity to a photon detector ofa luminometer; and (g) monitoring an output signal of the luminometerfor an indication of emission of bioluminescent radiation from thereaction chamber indicative of the presence of bacterial cells in thesample.

Preferably, the first reagent solution comprises an extracting agent.More preferably, the extracting agent is a detergent. Even morepreferably, the extracting agent is benzalkonium chloride.

In one aspect of this embodiment, the second reagent solution comprisesa neutralizing agent. Preferably, the neutralizing agent is selectedfrom the group consisting of non-ionic detergents, cyclodextrins andbovine serum albumin.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention contemplates a samplingwand for use in a device for a chemiluminescent assay of microbialspecies on a solid surface, the wand comprising (a) an internal reagentreservoir disposed toward a distal end of the wand; (b) an externalsampling swab disposed on a surface at the distal end of the wand; and(c) a frangible seal disposed between the sampling swab and the reagentreservoir. Preferably, the sampling swab is comprised of a porous,absorbent polymeric material. More preferably, the swab is in acylindrical shape. More preferably still, the height of the cylindricalswab is less than the diameter of the swab.

In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a methodfor sampling a solid surface for an analyte of interest, wherein themethod comprises the steps of (a) providing a sampling wand; (b)contacting the wand with a reagent solution so as to load the samplingswab with a volume of the reagent solution; (c) contacting the surfaceto be sampled with the sampling swab; (d) moving the wand while incontact with the surface, and while exerting sufficient pressure on thesampling swab to expel onto the surface a significant portion of thevolume of reagent solution previously absorbed into the swab; (e)reducing the pressure exerted on the swab; and (f) further moving thewand while in contact with the surface so as to re-absorb the reagentsolution into the sampling swab. Preferably, the reagent solution isloaded into the sampling swab to a level from 50 to 80% of theabsorptive capacity of the swab. More preferably, the reagent solutioncomprises an extracting agent. Even more preferably, the extractingagent is a detergent. More preferably still, the detergent isbenzalkonium chloride.

In still another aspect of the present invention, the analyte ofinterest is a substance derived from the group consisting of prokaryoticand eukaryotic cells. Preferably, the analyte of interest is adenosinetriphosphate (ATP). More preferably, the adenosine triphosphate isderived from microbial cells.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the analytical device of the presentinvention.

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the sampling wand of the device of FIG.1.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the analysis structure of the device ofFIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is an exploded view of the sampling/analysis member of the deviceof FIG. 1.

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the sampling/analysis member of thedevice of FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 is an illustration of the sampling wand of the device of FIG. 1.sampling a surface suspected of bacterial contamination.

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of the sampling/analysis member of thedevice of FIG. 1. illustrating the sampling wand in a first operativeposition within the sampling/analysis device.

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of the sampling/analysis member of thedevice of FIG. 1. illustrating the sampling wand in a second operativeposition within the sampling/analysis device.

FIG. 9 is a magnified view of the distal end of the sampling/analysismember of the device of FIG. 1 with the sampling wand in a secondoperative position within the sampling/analysis device.

FIG. 10 is a partial cut-away perspective view of the luminometer of thedevice of FIG. 1.

FIG. 11 is a plot of relative luminescent intensity for reactantmixtures prepared with (♦) and without (▪) trehalose in the reactantloading solution for use with the device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 12 is a plot of luminescent intensity as a function of theconcentration of trehalose in the reactant solution for use with thedevice of FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In general, the present invention provides an apparatus and methods thatmake possible the rapid detection through chemiluminescence of materialsindicative of the presence of microbial species, including bacteria, ona surface. The present invention is capable of use by unskilledoperators under the relatively harsh field environment of institutionalfood preparation services, health care providers and the like.

Bioluminescence refers to the visible light emission in living organismsthat accompanies the oxidation of organic compounds such as luciferins,mediated by an enzyme catalyst, such as luciferase. Luminescentorganisms, which include bacteria, fungi, fish, insects, algae, andsquid, have been found in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial habitats,with bacteria being the most widespread, and abundant, luminescentorganism in nature. Although their primary habitat is in the ocean infree-living, symbiotic, saprophytic or parasitic relationships, someluminescent bacteria are found in terrestrial or freshwater habitats.The enzymes involved in the luminescent (lux) system, includingluciferase, as well as the corresponding lux genes, have been mostextensively studied from the marine bacteria in the Vibrio andPhotobacterium genera and from terrestrial bacteria in the Xenorhabdusgenus, in particular the Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio fischeri, photobacteriumphosphoreum, Photobacterium leiognathi, and Xenorhabdus luminescensspecies. It has been found that the light-emitting reactions are quitedistinct for different organisms, with the only common component beingmolecular oxygen. Therefore, significant differences have been foundbetween the structures of the luciferases and the corresponding genesfrom one luminescent organism to another.

Chemiluminescent reactions can be used in various forms to detectbacteria in fluids and in processed materials. In the practice of thepresent invention, a chemiluminescent reaction based on the reaction ofadenosine triphosphate (ATP) with luciferin in the presence of theenzyme luciferase to produce light provides the chemical basis for thegeneration of a detectable analytical signal. Since ATP is present inall living cells, including all microbial cells, this method can providea rapid assay to obtain a quantitative or semi-quantitative estimate ofthe number of living cells in a sample, or on a sample surface. Earlydiscourses on the nature of the underlying reaction, the history of itsdiscovery, and its general area of applicability, are provided by E. N.Harvey (1957), A History of Luminescence: From the Earliest Times Until1900, Amer. Phil. Soc., Philadelphia, Pa.; and W. D. McElroy and B. L.Strehler (1949), Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 22:420-433.

ATP detection is a reliable means to detect bacteria and other microbialspecies because all such species contain some ATP. Chemical bond energyfrom ATP is utilized in the bioluminescent reaction that occurs in thetails of the firefly Photinus pyralis. The biochemical components ofthis reaction can be isolated free of ATP and subsequently used todetect ATP in other sources. Alternatively, the genes producing theproteins that participate in the bioluminescent reaction can beisolated, cloned into a suitable expression system, and used to producea recombinant form of the luminescent reactants. Examples of suchtechniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,668, the specificdisclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The mechanismof this firefly bioluminescence reaction has been well characterized(DeLuca, M., et al., 1979 Anal. Biochem. 95:194-198). Of note is thatluciferase-based assays differ from most familiar enzyme-basedanalytical determinations. Most enzyme-based assays monitor either theproduction of a product or the disappearance of a substrate. Usually,the compound measured is stable so that its concentration can bedetermined after a specific time. At low adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP)concentrations, however, the kinetics of the luciferase reactionapproach pseudo-first order behavior.

In the case of the luciferase reaction, AMP, PP_(i), CO₂, andoxyluciferin are typical products that accumulate, but the product thatprovides the analytical signal is light. The two-step luciferasereaction sequence is shown below. Step one forms an enzyme-boundluciferyl adenylate. Either Mg-ATP or LH₂ (luciferin) can add first tothe enzyme LUC.

LH₂+MgATP+LUC→LUC—LH₂—AMP+MgPP₁  (1)

Step two is the oxidative decarboxylation of luciferin with theproduction of light on decay of the excited form of oxyluciferin.

LUC—LH₂—AMP+O₂+OH⁻→LUC—OL+CO₂+AMP+light (550-570 nm)+H₂O  (2)

The oxyluciferin product, OL, is released slowly from the enzyme-productcomplex. This gives the flash kinetic pattern observed with high ATPconcentrations, not typically encountered under conditions of practiceof the present invention, under which conditions the luciferase actscatalytically. The initial flash of light emission observed with highATP concentration is owing to a “first round” of enzyme activity. Thisflash rapidly decays to a relatively constant light emission, similar tothat seen at low ATP concentrations, which is thought to be the resultof the enzyme slowly turning over by releasing the oxyluciferin.

Turning now to the Figures, there is provided in FIG. 1 an illustrationof the hand-held automatic chemiluminescence assay device of the presentinvention, shown generally at 10. Shown in FIG. 1 is thesampling/analysis member 15, and the hand-held luminometer 20, designedto accept the sampling/analysis member 15. As can be seen from FIG. 1,and the following Figures, the luminometer 20 of the present inventionis of a scale that can easily fit into an operator's hand, makingpossible essentially single-handed operation. The sampling/analysismember 15 can be held in one hand and easily inserted in the sample port24 of the luminometer as the operator holds the device in the operator'sother hand. Once the internal electronics of the luminometer 20 are in aready state, full insertion of the sampling wand 17 into the assemblyalready inserted into the luminometer brings the chemiluminescentreaction into close proximity to the luminometer's detector circuitry(not shown). A digital readout is then displayed on the luminometer'sdisplay screen 28. The readout displayed on the screen informs theoperator of the relative hygienity of the sampled surface based upon thedetection of chemiluminescence indicating the presence of ATP frommicrobial cells. For further details regarding the mechanical andelectronic structure of the luminometer device of the present invention,the reader is referred to co-pending application Ser. No. 09/821,571,filed concurrently herewith, the disclosure of which is herebyspecifically incorporated by reference.

By reference to FIGS. 2 and 3, the sampling/analysis member 15 isdepicted to illustrate two of the component structures of the member.FIG. 2 illustrates the sampling wand component 17 of thesampling/analysis member 15. The sampling wand 17 is further comprisedof a top 19 located at the proximal end of the wand. The primary purposeof the top 19 is to provide a structure that facilitates the operator'smanipulation of the sampling wand 17 as the wand is moved betweenspecific positions within the inner chamber (not illustrated) of thesampling/analysis member 15. Although FIG. 2 illustrates the top 19 in asubstantially flat cylindrical shape, it will be appreciated that thisshape is for illustrative purposes only, and that other, equally useful,geometries are possible and within the grasp of one of ordinary skill inthe appropriate art.

Also illustrated in FIG. 2 are additional structural elements of whichthe sampling wand 17 is comprised. These include a reagent reservoir 23located toward the distal end of the sampling wand 17. This reservoir isof approximately 200-250 μL in total volume. As will be discussed ingreater detail below, the contents of this reservoir that, in oneembodiment, comprise a buffered neutralizing solution, are released intothe inner chamber (not illustrated) of the sampling/analysis member bypiercing structures located within that inner chamber. The sampling wand17 further comprises a polymeric swab disc 27 adhered to the exterior ofthe distal end of the sampling wand 17, and on a common vertical axiswith the wand. Also illustrated in FIG. 2 is an O-ring structure 25located toward the distal end of the wand 17, and situated on theexterior of the cylindrically shaped distal portion. The purpose of theO-ring 25 is to provide a sealing fit between the outer surface of thedistal portion of the wand 17 and the inner surface of the inner chamber(not illustrated) of the sampling/analysis member 15, as the wand 17moves longitudinally through the inner chamber. It is preferred toachieve such sealing fit between the wand 17 and the inner chamber inorder to prevent the drying out of the pre-wetted sampling swab 17.

Turning to FIG. 3, there is illustrated the analysis structure 30 of thesampling/analysis member 15 of the device of the present invention. Theanalysis structure 30 is substantially cylindrical in shape and isactually comprised, in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4, of twoseparate but mating components, an inner chamber 40, and an outerchamber 55. As will be recognized by one of skill in the appropriateart, the use of two separate structures in the sampling/analysis memberis dictated more by manufacturing concerns than by operational factorsand that the present invention contemplates a device that may beconstructed of a single chamber. Located at the distal end of the outerchamber 55 of the analysis structure 30 is a reaction well 36 that, asis apparent from FIGS. 3-5, is co-linear along the same central axis asthe inner chamber 40 and the analysis structure 30. The diameter of thecylindrically shaped reaction well 36 is slightly smaller than thediameter of the outer chamber 55. The point of juncture between thewalls of the outer chamber 55 and the slightly narrower walls definingthe reaction well 36 portion of the outer chamber form a shoulder region46, best seen in FIGS. 4 and 5. In the bottom wall 48 of the reactionwell 36 is a reagent disc cavity 45, best seen in FIG. 5, and seen inhidden lines in FIG. 3. The reagent disc cavity 45 holds the reagentdisc 48, the composition of which is discussed in more detail below.Also illustrated in FIG. 3 is the top rim 42 of the inner chamber 40. Asis best illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5, the bottom edge 43 of the top rim42 of the inner chamber, in the fully assembled arrangement of thesampling/analysis member 15, rests on the top edge 57 of the outerchamber 55.

FIG. 4 illustrates the sampling/analysis member 15 of the device of thepresent invention in an exploded view. Part numbers are consistent withthe part numbers referenced in FIGS. 1-3 for identical structuralelements, a convention adhered to throughout this description. Startingfrom the top, or proximal, end of the sampling/analysis member, there isshown a top 19 of the sampling wand 17. Toward the distal end of thesampling wand 17, there is shown the reservoir 23, and the O-ringchannel 26. Immediately below the distal end of the sampling wand 17,there is shown the O-ring 25 that sits in the O-ring channel 26 toprovide, as discussed above, a sealing fit between the sampling wand 17and the inner walls of the inner chamber 40. Shown immediately below theO-ring is the upper seal 29 that sits on the lower edge/surface (notshown) of the distal end of the sampling wand 17. The seal 29 is made ofa frangible material, preferably aluminum foil coated to improvechemical resistance, and is adhered through use of an appropriateadhesive to the bottom edge/surface of the sampling wand. The seal 29serves to seal the reagent solution within the reservoir 23, and toprevent the diffusion of species from the reservoir across the membraneas would likely be the case with non-metallic seals. The next componentillustrated in FIG. 4 is the polymeric sampling swab, the composition ofwhich is discussed in more detail below. The sampling swab 27 is affixedto the bottom of the sampling wand 17, with the upper seal 29 interposedbetween it and the reagent reservoir 23.

The next component illustrated in FIG. 4 is the inner chamber 40 of thesampling/analysis member 15. The inner chamber 40 is cylindrical inshape and sized to fit snugly within the outer chamber 55, also shown inFIG. 4. Located at the proximal end of the inner chamber 40 is the toprim 42. At the distal end of the inner chamber is the bottom edge 41. Ascan be seen in FIG. 4, the cylindrically shaped inner chamber 40 is openat both ends. The top, or proximal, end of the inner chamber iseffectively closed by the bottom of the sampling wand 17, through thesealing effect of the O-ring 25 as it contacts the inner walls of theinner chamber 40. The bottom, or distal, end of the inner chamber 40 issealed by a first seal 49, as seen on the right side of FIG. 4, affixedwith an appropriate adhesive to the bottom edge 41 of the inner chamber.Like the upper seal, the first seal 49 is composed of a frangiblematerial, preferably aluminum foil.

Moving to the right side of FIG. 4, there is shown, at 53, a piercingmember, comprised of a circular base 54 at the distal end, and a point52, at the proximal end. Immediately below the piercing member 53 is thecutting member 56, which is substantially cylindrical in shape. Each endof the cutting member 56 is open, and the distal, or bottom, edge of thecutting member, the cutting edge 58, is angled so that the top edge isnot parallel to the cutting edge. Also illustrated is the base channel59 that is circumferentially positioned within the cutting member 56.The base 54 of the piercing member 53 rests within the base channel 59so that, when the sampling/analysis member 15 is fully assembled, as isillustrated in FIG. 5, the piercing member 53 sits within the cuttingmember 56, which, in turn, sits within the inner chamber 40 of thesampling/analysis member 15. The central axis of the piercing member 53is co-extensive with the central axis of the cutting member 56, theinner chamber 40, and the outer chamber 55 of the sampling/analysismember 15.

Second seal 50 is affixed through the use of an appropriate adhesive tothe shoulder region 46 of the outer chamber 55. However, in analternative embodiment of the device, the outer chamber can beconstructed without the second seal 50. Manufacturing concerns, ratherthan operational concerns, will frequently dictate the use of both first49 and second 50 seals. The final component of the sampling/analysismember 15 illustrated in FIG. 4 is the reagent disc 48. As isillustrated by the hidden lines at the distal end of the outer chamber55, the reagent disc 48 sits within a reagent disc cavity 45 (best seenby reference to FIG. 5) in the bottom of the reaction well 36.

FIG. 5 provides a cross-sectional view of the fully assembledsampling/analysis member 15 prior to use. By reference to FIG. 5, itwill be possible to gain an appreciation of the relative positioning ofthe individual components of the member 15 in this assembled state. Inthis state, the bottom edge 41 of the inner chamber 40 rests on theshoulder region 46 of the outer chamber 55, toward the distal end ofthat chamber. Also apparent are the first 49 and second 50 sealspositioned on the bottom edge 41 of the inner chamber and the shoulderregion 46 of the outer chamber, respectively. By reference to FIG. 5, itcan be seen that the cutting member 56 is positioned within the innerchamber 40 so that the distal cutting edge 58 is positioned directlyabove the first and second seals, 49 and 50. In the assembled state, thepiercing member 53 sits with its base 54 situated within the cuttingmember 56, specifically within the base channel 59 of the cuttingmember. In the fully assembled arrangement, the point 52 of the piercingmember 53 is positioned immediately below the sampling swab 27.Immediately above the sampling swab 27, on the proximal side of theupper seal 29, is the reagent reservoir 23 in the sampling wand 17. Asprovided in the assembled configuration, the sampling/analysis member 15may be provided with an external seal (not shown) that serves as a vaporbarrier preventing loss of reagent or wetting solution from within thedevice.

Referring now to FIGS. 6 through 9, there is illustrated the sequentialoperation of the sampling/analysis member of the device of the presentinvention. FIG. 6 illustrates the use of the sampling wand 17, held in asingle hand 62 of the operator, to obtain a sample from a surface 60suspected of bacterial contamination. In a preferred manner, thesampling/analysis member 15 is first inserted into the port 24 of theassay device 10. If a protective external seal has been provided withthe sampling/analysis member, then the seal must first be broken and/orremoved before the sampling wand 17 can be inserted into the port 24. Ascan be seen from FIG. 6, the sampling wand 17 is then removed from theinner chamber 40 of the sampling/analysis member 15. Once removed, thesampling wand 17 can be placed in close proximity to the surface to besampled so that the sampling swab 27 contacts the surface. As will bediscussed in more detail below, the sampling swab 27 is preferablypackaged and sealed in the sampling/analysis member in a pre-wettedstate. More preferably, the sampling swab 27 is pre-wetted with asolution of an extracting agent, preferably in an appropriate buffer tomaintain the solution at a pH value in the range of 5.7 to 7.5. Apreferred extracting agent is a cationic detergent.

Several suitable detergents or combination of detergents are known tothose skilled in the art and include nonionic detergents such as TritonX-100, Tween 20, Tween 80, Nonidet P40, n-Undecyl Beta-Dglucopyranoside; zwitterionic detergents such asn-hexadecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate; and cationicdetergents such as alkyltrimethylammonium bromides, benzalkoniumchloride, cetyldimethyl-ethylammonium bromide, dodecyltrimethylammoniumbromide, and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. The concentration ofdetergent solution varies for each type of detergent and can range from0.001-10% (wgt/vol). Particularly preferred detergent solution wouldcontain benzalkonium chloride, or similar cationic detergent, at aconcentration of 0.01-1% (wgt/vol).

In a most preferred embodiment, the sampling swab 27 is loaded with from40 to 80 μL of the detergent solution, preferably 75 μL. The samplingswab 27 is of a size and composition such that the maximum loading ofthe swab would be approximately 100-125 μL of the detergent solution.With a preferred polymeric composition, the cylindrically shapedsampling swab 27 would be approximately 8 mm in diameter and 1.5-1.8 mmin height (dry). As expected for such an absorbent material, significantswelling would accompany the uptake of pre-wetting solution so thatfinal dimensions at preferred loading levels would be on the order of9-10 mm×2.5-3.5 mm.

It should be noted that, according to the present invention, the exactloadings and capacity of the sampling swab 27 are not absolute. What isimportant to the practice of the methods of the present invention isthat the sampling swab, whatever its specific geometry, or its absolutecapacity to absorb and hold a solution of an extracting agent, be loadedwith a solution of such agent to a level that is somewhat below thesaturation capacity of the swab material. The specific significance ofthis loading level will be addressed in more detail below.

As can be seen from the Figures, including FIG. 6, the sampling swab 27is represented as having a regular cylindrical geometry. As should alsobe apparent to one of skill in the appropriate art, the use of a regularcylindrical geometry is for illustrative purposes only, and is notintended to limit the range of suitable geometries for the sampling swab27 in the practice of the present invention. For example, it may proveto be advantageous to provide the sampling swab 27 in a geometry wherethe bottom surface of the swab cylinder that actually comes in contactwith the surface to be sampled is not parallel to the top surface of theswab. In this regard, the bottom surface of the sampling swab 27 isangled downward. Thus configured, the sampling swab may be better ableto reach less accessible portions of the surface to be sampled, such ascorners or ridges or other surface irregularities, particularly wherethat surface is not perfectly planar and/or regular.

Once the sampling swab 17 has been used to collect a sample from thesurface onto the sampling swab 27, the sampling wand 17 is returned tothe sampling/analysis member 15 where the wand is re-inserted into theinner chamber 40 of the sampling/analysis member. When firstre-inserted, the sampling wand 17 can be returned to its originallongitudinal position within the inner chamber 40 of thesampling/analysis member 15. In that position, the member 15 is insubstantially the same arrangement as depicted in FIG. 5. In thatarrangement, upper seal 29 remains undisturbed, and the contents of thereservoir 23 are intact.

FIG. 7 illustrates the sampling wand 17 moved longitudinally within theinner chamber 40 of the sampling/analysis member to a first operationalposition. In this first operational position, the sampling wand 17 hasbeen moved downward so that the point 52 of the piercing member 53 movesupward, in a relative sense, piercing the sampling swab 27, upper seal29, and releasing the contents of the reagent solution from thereservoir 23. The reagent solution thus released travels downward out ofthe reservoir 23 and diffuses through the sampling swab 27 and into thedistal end of the inner chamber 40 of the sampling/analysis member 15.Preferably the reagent solution in the reservoir contains a neutralizingsolution to counteract the effects of any residual cleaning agents,typically chlorine-based, present on the solid surface being sampledwith the device of the present invention. In addition, the reagentsolution also contains a buffering agent to maintain the solution at apH value of approximately 7.5. The reagent solution can also containnon-ionic detergents such as Tween 80 and Triton X-100, or other speciessuch as cyclodextrins, bovine serum albumin, and other suitableneutralizing species. As the solution diffuses through the sampling swab27, it effectively rinses the sample obtained from the surface to beanalyzed into the solution collected at the bottom of the inner chamber.

From this first operational position, the sampling wand 17 may be urgedfurther downward to a second operational position, as shown in FIG. 8,and in magnified detail in FIG. 9. In so moving, the cutting edge 58 ofthe cutting member 56 is forced to break through the first and, ifpresent, second seals, 49 and 50, respectively. In doing so, the reagentsolution from the reservoir, that has effectively removed from thesampling swab 27 any microbial species and/or chemicals derivedtherefrom obtained from the surface to be analyzed, is permitted to flowfurther downward through the inner chamber 40 and into the reaction well36 at the distal end of the outer chamber 55. In returning the samplingwand 17 to the sampling/analysis member 15, and moving the sampling wanddownward to the first and second operational positions, the outersurface of the outer chamber 55 or of the sampling wand 17 may beprovided with external markings, such as circumferential rings,indicating to the operator the appropriate positions to which to movethe distal end of the sampling wand 17. As described immediately above,the sampling wand 17 may be moved downward through the chambers 40 and55 of the sampling/analysis member 15 in a step-wise progression.However, it is also possible to move the sampling swab downward in asingle movement without pausing between the first and second operationalpositions.

As the reagent/sample solution collects in the reaction well 36 of theouter chamber 55, the solution comes into contact with the reagent disc48. As a result of this contact, the reagents contained therein arerehydrated. In rehydrated form, the reagents are free to react with theextracellular ATP released from the bacterial species collected from thesampled surface. Once allowed to react, the ATP, if present, will leadto the production of light (luminescence). The reaction, in normalpractice, occurs within the reaction well 36, inserted in closeproximity to the detector of the luminometer 20 of the presentinvention. Due to the kinetics of the reaction and the solubility of thereagents, at low ATP concentrations optimal luminescent intensity isnormally observed within 20-60 seconds of commencement of thechemiluminescent reaction, and possibly within 30-40 seconds. Usingtechniques known to one of ordinary skill in the appropriate electronicsarts, it is possible to design the detector and display circuitry of theluminometer 20 to process the output signal so as to report an optimizedreading obtained most likely in that 30-40 second time window of theluminescent reaction.

By reference to FIG. 10, it is possible to see, via the cutout views inthe Figure, the position of the reaction well and, more specifically,the reagent disc cavity 45, relative to the detector circuitry 65. Thebottom wall of the reagent disc cavity 45 is transparent so that lightfrom the chemiluminescent reaction taking place within the reaction well36 is permitted to escape the reaction well and reach the detector 65.Also important to note here is that the only emitted light reaching thedetector emerges from the reagent disc cavity and not the surface of thesampling swab 27, which surface is too far removed from the detector andchemiluminescent reagents to produce light that contributes to theanalytical signal that is eventually reported to the operator on thedisplay screen 28 of the luminometer 20.

Referring back now to the individual components of the sampling/analysismember 15, it is useful to note certain characteristics and operationalspecifications of these components. Turning first to the sampling swab27, successful and optimal practice of the present invention placescertain requirements on the material used for the swab 27. As can beseen from the discussion of the prior art provided above, the vastmajority of the prior art sampling and/or analysis devices disclosedtherein utilize a “Q-Tip®” type sampling swab. As such, the swabs of theprior art were composed primarily of cotton or other fibrous materials,whether natural or man-made, or a combination thereof. Although suchmaterials can be utilized in a variety of applications, the presentinventors have determined that practice of the present invention can beoptimized through selection of the proper material for use as thesampling swab 27. Toward this end, the preferred material for use as thesampling swab is polymeric in nature, as opposed to the fibrous materialthat predominates in the prior art. Use of a polymeric material providesa number of advantages in the fabrication of the swab and also itsincorporation into the sampling wand 17. First of all, a suitablepolymeric material may be cast or formed into an appropriate geometrythat facilitates contact of the swab with the surface to be analyzed forthe presence of materials derived from microbial organisms, or otheranalytes of interest. As described above, the preferred geometry for thesampling swab 27 of the present invention provides a flat surface thatmaximizes surface area contact between the swab and the surface to beanalyzed. Use of the preferred alternative geometry wherein the bottomsurface of the swab is not parallel to the top surface further increaseseffective sampling surface area for the swab for a given cylindricalradius, but also provides a relatively sharp edge that can be effectivein reaching irregularities in the sampled surface. A further advantageof an appropriate polymeric material is that it can be sterilized bysteam and/or pressure, or by gamma irradiation. This is a characteristicthat is essential given the primary uses of the device of the presentinvention.

Use of a polymeric material for the sampling swab 27 makes it possibleto select and control optimal physical and chemical properties of theswab that enhance the effectiveness of the practice of the presentinvention. For example, as discussed above, the sampling swab 27 ispre-wetted, preferably with a detergent extractant solution. It isimportant to effective sampling of a surface to be analyzed that thesampling swab be pre-wetted with solution at a loading that is somewhatbelow the saturation capacity of the swab material. With a polymericmaterial as the sampling swab, it is possible to fabricate the swab withspecific densities and internal pore sizes so as to be able to achievespecific fluid loading characteristics, and to insure that thesecharacteristics are met uniformly both throughout the swab and also fromone swab to the next. The inventors have determined that a particularlypreferred type of polymeric material is composed of the reaction productof polyvinyl alcohol and an aldehyde. In this regard, reference is madeto U.S. Pat. No. 4,098,728, the disclosure of which, herein incorporatedspecifically by reference, teaches methods for the preparation of suchpolymeric species. However, based on the disclosure contained herein,one of skill in the appropriate art will recognize that other polymericmaterials, such as forms of polyvinyl alcohol, will serve as well,provided these materials possess the desired physical and chemicalproperties.

The present inventors have determined that the Merocel® brand ofpolymeric films, available from Medtronic Merocel, of Mystic, Conn., isparticularly well suited for use as the sampling swab material. TheMerocel® brand is commercially available in a number of grades with arange of physical properties across the grades. An alternative source ofpolymeric materials suitable for use in the methods and apparatus of thepresent invention is Hydrofera, of Willimantic, Conn. The preferredgrade of Merocel® for the sampling swab is sold under a productdesignation of CF200. Typical properties for such a product are providedin Table 1, below.

TABLE 1 Merocel ® CF200 Property Value Density (dry) >0.10 g/cc Averagepore size 0.2 mm Pore size range 0.004-0.4 mm Void Volume ≦90%Absorbency time ASTM D1117-80 <5 sec. Absorptive capacity <10 times (gwater/g material) Retained capacity 6-8 times

The Merocel® CF200 offers a number of advantages over alternativeswabbing materials heretofore used in the prior art. Chemicallyspeaking, the material is highly resistant to chemical attack, includingattack from fluids with both high and low pH (basic and acidic,respectively). Thus, the film is an extremely durable material. This isparticularly advantageous in a component of the device that may have arelatively long expected shelf life. The mechanical durability of theswab is also superior to prior art swabbing materials. Unlike “Q-Tip®”type swabs composed of fibrous materials, polymeric swabs are not proneto unraveling or loss of strands of the fibrous material from the swabtip. In addition, polymeric swabs are far less likely than cellulosesponges, the primary alternative to fibrous swabs in the prior art, toshredding or crumbling at the edges. As will be illustrated below, animportant characteristic of the preferred material for the sampling swab27 is that the absorbent nature of the material provides nearlyinstantaneous wicking when in contact with moisture. This greatlyfacilitates the sampling process, described immediately below, wherebybacterial organisms are removed from a surface to be sampled.

In actual use, as illustrated in FIG. 6, the sampling wand 17, afterextraction from the sampling/analysis member 15, is positioned above thesurface to be analyzed so that the sampling swab 27 at the distal end ofthe sampling wand 17 is in contact with the surface. In a preferredmethod of use, the pre-wetted sampling swab is pressed to the surface tobe analyzed with sufficient force that, as the sampling swab 27 is movedacross the surface, the detergent extractant solution with which it hasbeen pre-wetted is expelled from the swab and spread over the surface tobe analyzed. The sampling wand 17 is then wiped again across the now wetsurface. The absorptive capacity of the Merocel® CF200 swab is such thatthe swab effectively reabsorbs the moisture from the surface to besampled. The microbial cells taken up from the surface in this mannerhave thus already been in contact with the extracting agent and theprocess of cell disruption to release cellular ATP has already begun.Thus, when the sampling wand 17 is returned to the sampling/analysismember 15, and the sampling wand is forced downward within the chambersof the analysis structure 30, the release of ATP from the bacterialcells should be largely accomplished and the resulting solution shouldrequire less time before reaction with the chemiluminescent reagents toproduce the emitted light that constitutes the analytical signal.

Although the Figures and the description provided above are primarilydirected to the use of the device and methods of the present inventionin the sampling of solid surfaces, it should be noted that the deviceand methods disclosed herein are particularly suited to adaptation foruse with other types of samples and alternative methodology. Forexample, the device of the present invention can readily be used tosample for materials indicative of the presence of microbial species inliquid samples and not just on solid surfaces. To obtain a sample from aliquid source using the sampling wand 17 of the present invention, theswab 27 on the sampling wand should contain an effective amount of anextracting agent such as a detergent. The swab 17 can be loaded with adetergent solution simply by contacting the swab to an appropriatesolution. Alternatively, the swab can be further treated aftercontacting a detergent solution by evaporation of the solvent from thedetergent solution, leaving behind the solute detergent species. Thespecific characteristics of the polymeric material of which the swab iscomprised are particularly well suited for this practice due to thelarge void volume within the polymer and the resulting absorptivecapacity of the swab. Furthermore, the large internal surface areawithin the polymeric material arising from the large void volumeprovides optimal conditions for the rapid mixing of liquids with the dryreagents, such as a detergent, loaded into the swab.

When sampling a liquid, the sampling wand 17 can simply be contactedwith the liquid, and the high absorptive capacity of the swab 27 shouldresult in an almost instantaneous wicking of the liquid to be sampledinto the swab. Alternatively, the liquid to be sampled can betransferred directly to the swab 27 by a dropper, pipette, or othersuitable transfer means. If necessary to acquire a sample of sufficientvolume, the size of the sampling swab 27 can be increased. Because it isimportant for the swab material to retain capacity to absorb additionalfluid when sampling a liquid, it is necessary to avoid pre-wetting theswab 27 to absorptive saturation or the swab will be unable to retain asufficient volume of the sampled liquid. Therefore, care must be takenwhen wetting the swab 27 when it is the intention of the operator to usethe swab in a pre-moistened state. It can be preferable, then, toutilize the swab 27 where the solvent from the detergent solution isevaporated away.

It should be recognized that one of the potential problems associatedwith sampling liquids is that the analyte of interest, for examplebacterial cells, may not be present at sufficiently high concentrationlevels to provide a meaningful sample. This situation is not unusualwhen assaying a liquid sample for microbial content. However, it ispossible to pre-concentrate the microbial species in the liquid byfiltering the liquid through an appropriate filter, such as one with afilter size of approximately 0.2 microns (μm). After the filtering step,the sampling wand 17 can be swiped across the surface of the filteringmedium to acquire the concentrated sample. The sampling wand can then beused in a manner consistent with the sampling of solid surfaces, asdescribed above.

Methods for use of the sampling device of the present invention can alsobe readily adapted to more conventional techniques associated withmicrobial assays. For example, a sample, whether from a liquid or from asolid surface, can be acquired as described above. However, instead ofsubsequent reaction and analysis in the luminometer device 20 of thepresent invention, the sample can be transferred from the sampling wand17 to a conventional culturing medium such as an agar plate. Oncetransferred to the culture medium, standard procedures for detection ofmicrobial growth can be utilized. In order to use the device of thepresent invention in such a manner, the sampling swab 27 would beprewetted with a sterile saline solution instead of with a solution ofan extracting agent. The contents of the reagent reservoir 23 within thesampling wand 17 preferably would also be a saline solution, or othersuch solution as would be consistent with retention on themicroorganism's viability. The sampling wand would then be pressedagainst the surface of the culture medium to express the sample from thesampling swab 27 to the medium. Alternatively, the container of theculture medium could be adapted with a structure to pierce the upperseal 29 in the sampling wand to release the saline solution storedtherein. In this manner, the release of the saline solution would rinsethe sample from the sampling swab 27 onto the culture medium. Thisalternative to the practice of the present invention offers additionaladvantages in that the culture medium can be selected to be specific forcertain microbial species, or otherwise adapted to more specific assaytechniques. In an alternative embodiment, the methods of the presentinvention can be adapted to include transfer of a sample to a vessel,other than the analysis structure 30, wherein the vessel containsaffinity reagents such as antibodies to a specific species. The affinityreagents permit only certain microbes to be retained within the vessel.These specific microbes can then be transferred to an appropriateculture medium for growth and subsequent analysis.

The reactant mixtures typically used for assays of the type involved inthe practice of the present invention, including luciferase, luciferin,and magnesium ion, are usually sold as a single combined reagent system,not as individual reagents. The luciferase must be within a suitable pHof approximately 7.0 to 8.5 in order to be effective, usually achievedby employment of a buffer system. An appropriate buffer system for thereactant solution would be one comprised of tricine,N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]glycine ((HOCH₂)₃C—NHCH₂COOH), preferablyat a concentration of 50 mM, sufficient to maintain the pH of thereactant solution in the range of 7.8 pH units. Alternatively, anappropriate buffer would beN-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), alsocapable of maintaining the solution at a pH value of approximately7.5-7.8. If the proper pH is not maintained, the reaction will not workefficiently, and the results will be erroneous. However, luciferase isunstable while in solution, and will degrade, particularly at highertemperatures. Generally, at room temperature, the luciferase solutionwill remain effective for a period of hours whereas, at near freezingtemperatures, the luciferase solution will last for a period of days. Inaddition, luciferin in solution is light sensitive. Light causes thedissolved luciferin to degrade, forming chemical species that have aninhibitory effect on the luciferin/luciferase reaction, potentiallyresulting in false negatives. To prevent degradation, the luciferin andluciferase can be dried and protected from light. Prior art methods fordrying include, but are not limited to, freeze-drying andlyophilization. When ready to use, the dried luciferin and luciferaseare dissolved in water containing an appropriate buffer to form anaqueous solution having the proper pH.

To address the problem of reagent stability, the present inventorsutilize a reagent disc 48, loaded with the chemiluminescent reactantsneeded to produce the analytical signal (chemiluminescence). The presentinventors have determined that a preferable material from which toconstruct the disc is a polymeric material, also available from Merocel®(under the CF50 product designation). A summary of the properties ofsuch a grade of material is provided below in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Merocel ® CF50 Property Value Density (dry) 0.049 g/cc Averagepore size 0.95 mm Pore size range 0.2-1.2 mm Void Volume 95% Absorbencytime <5 sec. ASTM D1117-80 Absorptive capacity <21 times (g water/gmaterial) Retained capacity 16 times

As discussed above, the inherent chemical and mechanical stability ofthe polymeric material is ideally suited for use as a medium on which toload the chemiluminescent reagents for the practice of the presentinvention. A number of commercial enterprises marketluciferin-luciferase reagent kits for use in chemiluminescent reactionassays. One that the inventors have found to be particularly well suitedfor the practice of the present invention is the “Firelight®”luciferin-luciferase reagent kit provided by Analytical LuminescentLaboratories (ALL) of Sparks, Md. Although ALL provides a number ofpre-prepared reagent kits, the present inventors have found that areagent mixture based on ALL catalog #2005 is particularly preferred,with the only modification from the commercially available catalogformulation being that the luciferase component of the formulation ispresent at twice the amount in the catalog formulation. This providesfor a greater intensity of luminescence, and faster reaction kinetics.

In the preparation of the reagent discs 48, the reactant concentrate isloaded, preferably drop-wise, onto the Merocel® CF50, obtained inpre-sterilized sheets. The coated sheets are then dried at ambienttemperatures under a vacuum, and the reagent discs are cut from thesheets in an appropriate size and shape. Alternatively, discs may be cutfirst and then loaded with appropriate reagent solution. When loaded insuch fashion with the reagent mixture, reagent discs, approximately 6 mmin diameter and approximately 1.5 mm in height, carry approximately 0.5mg of the dried reactant mixture.

Use of the polymeric material as a medium onto which to load thechemiluminescent reactants offers significant advantages over prior artmethods. To begin with, as discussed briefly above, aqueous solutions ofluciferin-luciferase at concentrations suitable for typical assayprocedures are relatively unstable and cannot be used more than a dayafter preparation without significant loss of emission intensity, andthen only after a recalibration of the emission signal as a function ofATP standard concentration. The recognized prior art solution to theproblems associated with instability of aqueous solutions of thereagents is to prepare the reagent mixture in a lyophilized, or freezedried, form, which composition is then typically coated on the innersurfaces of a reaction vessel. Direct loading onto the durable polymericmaterial eliminates the need for the lyophilization step in thepreparation of the reactants, and also provides for more readilyachieved rehydration of the reagents once the reactant disc 48 is incontact with the sample solution. This is due, in part, to therelatively large internal surface area of the preferred polymericmaterial (see Table 2, above) that provides for almost instantaneousmixing of the reservoir solution with the reagents in the reagent disc48.

The device and methods of the present invention are also adaptable toadditional procedures to enhance, in general, the effectiveness of theassay. For example, it is possible to significantly increase thesensitivity of the assay procedure by utilizing a chemicalpre-concentration step. In this manner, a microbial sample is collectedaccording to the procedures described above. Instead of immediatelytransferring the acquired sample to the analysis structure 30, thesample is transferred to a suitable reaction vessel wherein, accordingto procedures such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,902,722, thespecific disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference, allnucleic acids in the sample are converted to inorganic phosphate. By useof such a chemical pre-concentration step, it is theoretically possibleto achieve amplification by a factor of 10⁶, or more. Thus, a techniquethat normally has a threshold sensitivity requiring the presence of from1,000 to 10,000 microbial cells to generate an analytical signal candetect the presence of a single cell.

In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, thechemiluminescent reagent formulation loaded onto the reactant discs 48can be prepared with an additional ingredient that provides superiorresults in the chemiluminescent assay of the present invention. Thisadditional reagent is trehalose, a common disaccharide.

Macromolecular compounds, especially proteins and polypeptide-containingcompounds, commonly exist in their naturally occurring hydrated state inthe form of complex, three-dimensional folded conformations generallyknown as tertiary structures. Very frequently, the activity of thecompound, whether as an enzyme, antibody, antigen, flavorant,fluorescent, gelling agent, etc., is critically dependent on thetertiary structure and is severely reduced or even eliminated if thestructure is disturbed, even though the chemical empirical formula ofthe compound may not have changed. This is a very serious problem whenthe protein is required in a dry state for storage.

In order to combat this problem various solutions have been proposed. Inthe prior art, enzymes for dry immunoassay kits have been protected inliposomes. Trehalose, a-D-glucopyranosyl-a-D-glucopyranoside, is anaturally occurring non-reducing disaccharide that has previously beenassociated with cell protection. It is known that some organisms, bothplant and animal, can resist desiccation to very low levels of bodywater during drought conditions. These organisms include brine shrimpscysts (Artemia salina), the resurrection plant (Selaginellalepidophylla) and bakers yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). They allshare, as a common feature, the presence of large amounts of trehalosein their cells. A body of work in the prior art exists on the effects ofvarious carbohydrates including trehalose on the stabilization of cellmembranes during freezing and dehydration. This work shows trehalose tobe significantly superior to other carbohydrates in protecting cellularorganelles from the deleterious effects of the loss of bound water.

It is recognized in the prior art that trehalose will stabilize delicatematerials while they are freeze-dried. Freeze drying as a technique wasdevised as being the only way certain sensitive materials can behandled. Ordinary drying at ambient or elevated temperature and atatmospheric or reduced pressure causes irreversible degradation of verymany such substances, so much so that it has been accepted thatsensitive proteins must not be dried at ambient temperature. Infreeze-drying, the water is removed under high vacuum from the solidmaterial. In this way, problems such as liquid film denaturation ofproteins and thermal instability can be avoided. However, therequirement for freeze-dry preparation of reagents adds considerablecost and complexity to the process of reactant preparation. It is anadvantage of the practice of the present invention that such processesare not needed to maintain reagent stability. However, the presentinventors have discovered that addition of trehalose to the loadingsolution of the chemiluminescent reactant mixture, at levels approachingthe saturation solubility of trehalose in the solution, while providinga measurable stabilization effect as illustrated in FIG. 11, can alsoprovide up to a doubling, or more, of the biochemical activity of theluciferase component of the reagent mixture. In practical terms, thismeans that considerably less of the relatively expensivechemiluminescent reagents need to be used in the reactant mixture. Thepresence of trehalose and its effect on the luciferase activity alsoprovides for an enhancement of the emission signal and, thus, apotential increase in the sensitivity of the assay procedure.

When the reagent mixture includes an effective amount of trehalose, byway of example and without specific limitation, the 6 mm×1.5 mm reagentdisc has a total loading of approximately 4 mg. At this loading, as canbe seen from FIG. 12, observed luminescent intensities were more thantwice that obtained from the same loading of reagents without thetrehalose.

In addition to the luciferase reactant system disclosed above, it ispossible for the device and methods of the present invention to beadapted to assays of additional analytes of interest. In order toachieve this, the reactant mixture would be modified to comprise analternative enzyme to luciferase, where that enzyme would be capable ofoxidizing a specific substrate of interest. Examples of such substratesfor which specific enzymes are available would be sugars such as glucoseand galactose; lipids such as fatty acids and cholesterol; amino acidsand other amines; pyruvate; nicotine adenide dinucleotide (AND) andderivatives; and alcohols. In general, the substrate of interest wouldbe oxidized by the enzyme to generate hydrogen peroxide, H₂O₂, as one ofthe reaction products. The peroxide, in turn, can react with thespecific reactant system in the reactant disk 48, and generate aluminescence signal detectable in the luminometer 20 of the presentinvention. Thus, by changing the reactant mixture loaded onto thereactant disc 48, it is possible to adapt the device and methods of thepresent invention to assays for a wide range of analytes of interest.

A recognized problem associated with chemiluminescent assays of the typedisclosed herein, as alluded to in the general discussion above, is thatthe activity of the chemiluminescent reagents necessary for the assayprocedures is sensitive to inhibition by some commonly encounteredsubstances. Of particular importance among these inhibitory substancesis the chlorine used in typical cleaning and sanitizing formulations.The presence of residue from chlorine-based cleaners on a surface to beanalyzed for the presence of bacterial contamination could lead to falsenegative results from the assay procedure of the present invention. Thelikelihood of such an erroneous result is enhanced by the fact thatchlorine-based cleaners are frequently used to clean the type ofsurfaces most likely to be subject to the analyses of the presentinvention. However, even after the use of such cleaners to ostensiblysanitize, for example, a food preparation surface, it is possible forviable bacterial cells to remain on the surface. In such a case,however, it is likely that chlorine residue from the cleaner wouldinhibit the luciferin/luciferase-ATP reaction, effectively masking thepresence of persistent bacterial contamination, and producing a falsenegative result. Thus, a food preparation facility, suspectingpersistent bacterial contamination of their food preparation surfaces,and expecting the application of present invention, perhaps by municipalauthorities, to assess the hygiene of their facility, could utilize achlorine-based cleaner on the food preparation surface. Although such acleaner would have some sanitizing effect on the food preparationsurface, it is unlikely that its use would be completely effective.However, the inhibitory effect of residual chlorine species from thecleaner would produce a result that would be erroneously read asindicative of a clean surface, free from bacterial contamination. Thus,the purpose of the practice of the present invention would beeffectively thwarted.

An alternative embodiment to the present invention provides a procedureto determine whether residual inhibitory species, such as chlorine orother residue from a sanitizing agent, or other treatment, exist on asurface to be analyzed sufficient to cause a false negative result for abacterial assay according to the present invention. The reagentreservoir 23 provided in the sampling wand 17 of the present inventionpreferably comprises a neutralizing species in solution. See discussionabove. However, it is possible to prepare the reagent solution for thereservoir 23 to include instead a precisely known quantity of ATP. Thus,use of such a sampling wand in the practice of the present invention,without contacting the sampling swab with the surface to be analyzed,would provide an emission signal in the luminometer of the presentinvention that would be indicative of the known amount of ATP includedin the reagent solution stored in the reservoir 23. If this samplingswab, with the reagent solution modified to include a known amount ofATP, is used to first swab a surface to be analyzed for the presence ofmicrobial contamination, then the detected luminescence intensity shouldbe the sum of the intensity from the microbial ATP present in the sampleand the known ATP from the reagent solution. If, however, the assayresult obtained is significantly below that expected from the knownamount of ATP present in the reservoir solution, then this wouldindicate inhibition of the chemiluminescent reaction by a species suchas residual chlorine on the sampled surface. Thus, the operator wouldknow that use of the conventional sampling/analysis member would befruitless, as it would likely provide a false negative result. Theoperator would then have to wait to obtain a meaningful hygienedetermination until after the residual inhibitory species is removedfrom the surface to be analyzed. Thus, the apparatus of the presentinvention could be provided with both versions of the sampling/analysismember. An operator would first use the embodiment containing the knownamount of ATP and, only upon measuring a luminescence signal appropriatefor the known amount of ATP in the reagent reservoir, would the operatorproceed to use the conventional embodiment of the sampling/analysismember 15 to test the hygienity of the sampled surface.

What is claimed is:
 1. A device for use in a chemiluminescence assay forthe detection of cellular contamination, the device comprising: a.) asampling wand comprising: i. an internal reagent reservoir disposedtoward a distal end of the wand; ii. an external sampling swab disposedon a surface at the distal end of the wand; and iii. a first frangibleseal disposed between the sampling swab and the reagent reservoir; andb.) a reaction chamber comprising: i. an upper portion into which thesampling wand may be inserted in a fluid-tight, longitudinally slidablearrangement; ii. a lower portion; iii. a second frangible seal disposedbetween the upper portion and the lower portion; and iv. a reactant discdisposed within the lower portion at a distal end of the chamber; c.)means for rupturing said first and second seals; wherein, uponlongitudinal movement of the sampling wand within the upper chamber to afirst operative position, the first frangible seal is rupturedpermitting fluid flow of a reagent solution stored within the reservoirinto the upper portion of the chamber; and wherein, upon furtherlongitudinal movement of the sampling wand to a second operativeposition, the second frangible seal is ruptured, permitting fluid flowof the reagent solution from the upper portion of the chamber into thelower portion of the chamber, whereupon the reagent solution contactsthe reactant disc.
 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the reagentsolution within the reagent reservoir is a buffer solution.
 3. Thedevice of claim 2, wherein the buffer solution comprises a neutralizingagent.
 4. The device of claim 3, wherein the neutralizing agent isselected from the group consisting of non-ionic detergents,cyclodextrins, bovine serum albumin, and combinations thereof.
 5. Thedevice of claim 1, wherein the sampling swab is comprised of a polymericmaterial.
 6. The device of claim 1, wherein the sampling swab iscomprised of a polymeric material selected from the group consisting ofpolyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl acetal, and wherein the polymericmaterial has a density of approximately 0.1 g/cc, an average pore sizeof 0.2 mm, a pore size range of 0.004-0.4 mm, and an absorptive capacityof approximately 10 g water/g of polymeric material.
 7. The device ofclaim 5, wherein the sampling swab is wetted with a solution comprisingan extracting agent.
 8. The device of claim 7, wherein the extractingagent is a detergent.
 9. The device of claim 8, wherein the detergent isbenzalkonium chloride.
 10. The device of claim 1, wherein the reactantdisc is comprised of a polymeric material.
 11. The device of claim 1,wherein the polymeric material is comprised of a material selected fromthe group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl acetal, andwherein the polymeric material has a density of about 0.05 g/cc; anaverage pore size of 0.95 mm; a pore size range of about 0.2 mm to about1.2 mm; and an absorptive capacity of approximately 15 g of water/g ofpolymeric material.
 12. The device of claim 1, wherein the firstfrangible seal is comprised of aluminum foil.
 13. The device of claim 1,wherein the second frangible seal is comprised of aluminum foil.
 14. Thedevice of claim 1, wherein the first frangible seal is coated with achemically impervious material.
 15. The device of claim 1, wherein thesecond frangible seal is coated with a chemically impervious material.16. The device of claim 1, wherein the reactant disk is loaded withreagents for a chemiluminescent reaction.
 17. The device of claim 1wherein the reagents comprise a luciferase reactant system.
 18. Thedevice of claim 1, wherein the reactants are loaded onto the reactantdisk by contacting a solution of the reactants in an appropriate solventonto the polymeric material of which the disc is comprised andevaporating the solvent from the polymeric material.
 19. The device ofclaim 18, wherein the solution of reactants further comprises a buffer.20. The device of claim 19, wherein the buffer is a solution of tricine,N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]glycine.
 21. The device of claim 1, whereinat least a portion of the distal end of the reaction chamber istransparent to visible light.